Anselm and of gaunilo, two eleventhcentury thinkers, are both ontological in character. Descartes employed versions of the ontological argument where the very concept of god as a perfect being implies existence as a. The idea is that existing makes a good thing better than one thats only imaginary. Moreover, anselms argument was shown to be a valid argument, with a conclusion that follows from the premises. A proper understanding and analysis of nature reveals that there is a system that was properly constructed to ensure interdependence and correlation. Anselms s ontological argument is stated, and a few standard st. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Anselms ontological argument purports to be an a priori proof of gods existence. The ontological argument in pvs 1 introduction computer science. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. Proslogion preface1 upon the insistent adjurations of certain brothers i wrote a work as an example of meditating about the rational basis of faithin the role of someone who by arguing silently with himself investigates what he does not yet know.
The main difference is that anselm abided by the scholastic premise that the human mind comes into. There are different versions, but they all argue something like. Anselm suggests argument was given through religious experience. Anselm had a clear understanding of an all knowing, all powerful and an all loving god, thus believing god exists. A criticism of anselms ontological argument leaving. Anselms ontological argument alleges that god exists is a statement that, if we are thinking clearly and understand the definition of god, we can know to be true a priori. In the writings of anselm, we find what appear to be conflicting accounts of gods relationship to creaturely acts of sin. The core of anselms ontological argument uses a reductio ad absurdum structure to attempt to prove the existence of god. While gaunilo was a firm believer in god and was in fact a monk, he disagreed strongly with anselms. St anselms ontological argument is a deductive, priori, analytic argument which seeks to establish the existence of god by understanding the attributes of god in the sense of classic theism.
Over the centuries, many philosophers have presented criticisms against anselm s ontological argument, from gaunilo to descartes and locke to lotze. Anselm starts with an idea that depends on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to the conclusion that god exists. Criticisms of anselms ontological argument the postbarthian. In an analytic proposition, the predicate concept is contained in its subject concept. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari. Professor malcolm on anselm s ontological arguments, analysis, 1961. The second version does not rely on the highly problematic claim that existence is a property and hence avoids many of the objections to the classic version. Pdf in this article i offer a new interpretation of saint anselms ontological argument. This entry is a good place to start for clarification of the above notes to the argument. As is clearly evident, the ontological argument rests on the assumption that the concept of god, as it is described in the argument, is selfconsistent. He does this by showing that if the negation of the conclusion is followed then this leads to absurdity a false or nonsensical conclusion. It is supposed to show that god exists there are different versions, but they all argue something like.
The ontological argument describes god as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, anselm argued that the greatest possible being must exist otherwise he would not be the greatest possible being, although he must be the greatest possible being in every way. Anselms versions of the ontological argument descartes is not the first philosopher to state this argument. Strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument. Saint anselm of canterbury o ered several arguments for the existence of god. Ontological argument simple english wikipedia, the free. Anselm s argument found in the second chapter of his proslogion, gaunilo s criticism of. Theologian and philosopher anselm of canterbury 10331109 proposed an ontological argument in the second and third chapters of his proslogion. Proslogium, monologium, an appendix in behalf of the fool by gaunilon, and cur deus homo with an introduction, bibliography, and reprints of the opinions of leading philosophers and writers on the ontological argument, chicago. The validity of anselms ontological argument anselm expresses his ontological argument of proslogium, chapter ll as follows.
Anselm proposes that if god can be thought of and perceived, then he must. Newest ontologicalargument questions philosophy stack. The ontological arguments of god are many, the weaknesses they suffer can be found in this reference. Anselm wrote his proslogion as a prayer originally, but it later became an argument for god by establishing his attributes. Anselms ontological argument is an a priori proof of gods existence. This online translation of the proslogion is taken from a new, interpretive translation of st. Anselm s starting point for the argument came from a passage from the fool in the psalm. Compare anselms argument to paleys design argument for gods existence. Saint anselm of canterbury offered several arguments for the existence of god. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god corners around the definition of god as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived as well as two modes of existence, in the understanding and in reality anselm chapter 2. Maydole ontological arguments are deductive arguments for the existence of god from general metaphysical principles and other assumptions about the nature or essence of god. It is shaped by his central distinction between analytic and synthetic propositions.
Thus, a being that is omniscient lacks the ability to create free beings and is. In contrast, the ontological arguments are conceptual in roughly the following. Immanuel kant put forward an influential criticism of the ontological argument in his critique of pure reason. The philosophical consensus seems to be that the argument is hopeless. The ontological argument is an idea in religious philosophy. Essay on the ontological argument for the existence of god. The arguments attempt to prove god s existence from the meaning of the word god. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, but they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing.
Essay anselms ontological argument 1281 words bartleby. Essay about anselms ontological argument 680 words. Anselm ontological argument san jose state university. The ontological argument is the only argument that uses reason to justify the belief and that is also an a priori argument as it relies on knowledge gained from reasoning and not from empirical knowledge. The ontological argument is widely thought to have been first clearly articulated by st. We can attend to the logic of anselm s ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted wordplay, or we can seek to look beyond the flawed logic, to the search. Now we believe that you are are something than which nothing greater can be thought.
He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the. Pdf there is a hierarchy of arguments for the existence of god. Norman malcolm revived the ontological argument in 1960 when he located a second, stronger ontological argument in anselms work. The ontological argument therefore, lord, who grant understanding to faith, grant me that, in so far as you knowit beneficial, i understand that you are as we believe and you are that which we believe. Anselm s argument together with gaunilo s, aquinas and kant s objections are conveniently summarized by kenneth einar himma in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
Anselm of canterbury, who defined god as the greatest conceivable being. This book contains his proslogium, monologium, and cur deus homo, as well as appendices on behalf of the fool and anselms apologetic, anselms philosophy, and criticisms of anselms ontological argument for the being. Saint anselm 10331109 proslogion translated by sidney norton deane preface after i had published, at the solicitous entreaties of certain brethren, a brief work the monologion as an example of meditation on the grounds of faith, in the person of one who. Essay anselm s ontological argument 1281 words 6 pages. The ontological argument debunked anselm refuted duration.
Norman malcolm revived the ontological argument in 1960 when he located a second, stronger ontological argument in anselm s work. The classical ontological argument for gods existence proposed by anselm of canterbury can be summed up as god is the greatest possible being that can be imagined if that being existed in reality it. Therefore the argument works only in the case of god. Anselms reasoning was that, if a being existed only in the mind but not in reality, then a greater being was conceivable a being which exists both in the mind and in reality. Anselm 10331109 of canterbury was born in aosta, italy. The main weakness of anselms argument is posed by gaunilo of marmoutier, a contemporary of anselm, gaunilo posed, using reductio ad absurdum, that if the logic of the argument were applied to anything other than god, its conclusion would be unreasonable. Explain the ontological argument from anselms perspective. Mar 23, 2012 evaluate anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. By the ontological argument i mean the argument of proslogion ii. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. Anselms argument was not presented in order to prove gods existence.
The relevance of kants objection to anselms ontological. He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the ontological argument. The origins of the ontological argument are usually seen in the writings of st anselm of canterbury. Essay on anselms ontological argument 1217 words bartleby. The monologion begins with several arguments for the existence of god, arguments at first glance anselms project in the monologion might seem rather fishy. Anselms ontological argument was introduced during the 11th century and had stood deductively valid until the 18th century. Plantinga s modal ontological argument includes many of the aspects of anselm s original argument but includes various additions and changes. The simple argument in proslogion 2 was reduced to absurdity by anselm s fellow benedictine, gaunilo, in a witty reposte entitled liber pro insipiente or on behalf of the fool. One of the famous arguments for the existence of god is the ontological argument. Anselm of canterbury is most famous for his ontological argument for the existence of god, which is that god is the greatest necessary being that which may be thought of paraphrase. The modal ontological argument center for philosophy of religion. A new formalization of anselms ontological argument.
He is most famous in philosophy for having discovered and articulated the socalled ontological argument. The ontological argument for the existence of god the ontological argument is an a priori argument. Ontological argument anselm, descartes, and plantinga. A good discussion with extensive links to the history, classification, and classic objections to. Sep 01, 2010 anselm s ontological argument in proslogion 2 has been discussed and criticized so much that it is hard for us today to see its basic structure. And finally there is one more strong criticism where anselm s argument fails. Ontological argument for the gods existence internet. Anselm s response focuses on his position that god alone cannot be conceived not to exist. Formal reconstructions of anselms ontological argument. What are the differences between anselms ontological. Malcolm agrees with a tradition beginning with gaunilo in rejecting that argument. Wikipedias reprint from the scholarly 1911 encyclopedia britannica on anselm s life and works anselm, the ontological argument a short selection of anselm s argument from proslogium 2 in the online reading for philosophical inquiry on this site. The honor of being the first to present this argument fully and clearly belongs to saint anselm of canterbury 10331109.
Saint anselm 10331109 proslogion translated by sidney. Speaks january 6, 2006 1 anselms presentation of the argument anselms argument begins with a statement of what god is. The ontological argument, an 11th century proof of the existence of god. In the ontological argument we start from a concept in the mind. The latin text, collated by hopkins and published in the foregoing work, is not here reprinted.
Fideists would take issue as if it proves gods existence, removes virtue of faith. Jan 06, 2006 anselms idea is that the problem with the argument which leads to c is that 2 is false. Ratio, intelligere, and cogitare in anselms ontological ine nolan proceedings of the american catholic philosophical association. Anselms ontological argument essay example graduateway. First, it aims at introducing the ontological argument through the analysis of five historical developments. Nowwe believe that you are something than which nothing greater can be imagined. In this paper i argue, against plantinga and others, that kants claim is indeed relevant to anselms argument, in the straightforward sense that if the claim is true, then anselms argument is unsound. Hence, even the fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding, at least, than which nothing greater can be conceived.
Anselm of canterbury 10331109 saint anselm was one of the most important christian thinkers of the eleventh century. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is selfcontradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Most people believe that god exists, and many have attempted to give rational arguments or proofs for his existence. But many philosophers are skeptical about this underlying assumption. The premises of anselms ontological argument were demonstrated to be sound when examined in the context of anselms definition of the greatest conceivable being. The form of the argument is that of a reductio ad absurdum argument. The first published criticism of anselms ontological argument was from gaunilo in his book in behalf of the fool making reference to the fool in the book of psalms who didnt believe in god. The idea is that existing makes a good thing better than one that s only imaginary. One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an allperfect god is the ontological argument. Saint anselm of canterbury 10331109 was the outstanding christian philosopher and theologian of the eleventh century. When the ontological argument is set alongside the a posteriori arguments for gods existence, a cumulative case is made for iteven if the formal purity of the argument might be compromised. The ontological argument for the existence of god is the only a priori argument for gods existence.
The ontological argument ought not be jettisoned from a cumulative case for gods existence simply because it has failed to satisfy all those who. The first ontological argument in the western christian tradition 1 was proposed by anselm of canterbury in his 1078 work proslogion. Plantingas modal ontological argument includes many of the aspects of anselm s original argument but includes various additions and changes. Alvin plantinga challenged this argument and proposed an alternative, based on modal logic. He has two versions of it, and they are the most widely discussed among the many versions of this argument. Actually anselm s argument belittles the definition of god, since it cannot be derived from his proof whether god is allpowerful, all knowing, and omnipresent or not. Explain anselms ontological argument essay example. In chapter 2 of anselm s proslogian, anselm offers what was later to be characterized as his ontological argument, which is an argument for gods existence he felt was so strong that even a fool as is said in psalms 14. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. The ontological argument from st anselm, proslogium, trans.
Anselm defined god as a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists 2, and argued that this being must exist in the mind, even in the mind of the person who denies the existence of god. Anselm s argument in proslogion 2 was a reflection or prayer rather than a formal piece of. Anselms second version of the ontological argument as it turns out, there are two different versions of the ontological argument in the prosologium. Ontological arguments about the existence of god, based in premises ostensibly derived. Explain anselms ontological argument essay graduateway.
The ontological argument of gods existence may be traced back to st. A more recent ontological argument came from kurt godel, who proposed a formal argument for gods existence. The greatest similarity is that both start from ideally conceived notions, as opposed to arguments from reality like those by aristotle and aquinas. Anselm of canterbury was a neoplatonic realist and was.
But it is the other argument with which malcolm is particularly concerned. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontology. And, as is well known, of all the versions of the ontological argument, it is anselms argument for gods existence that stands out the most. The argument for the existence of god will always give rise to infinitive points of view. Strength and weaknesses of ontological argument free.
Strength and weaknesses of ontological argument free essays. Ontological argument project gutenberg selfpublishing. While gaunilo was a firm believer in god and was in fact a monk, he disagreed strongly with anselms method for proving his existence. If one wants to deny that god exists, one has to do one of two things. Plantinga basically uses a possible world analysis. Many recent authors have interpreted this argument as a modal one. Ontological argument criticisms introduction to philosophy. The ontological argument was introduced by anselm of canterbury in his book proslogion. Reprinted by permission of open court publishing company, a division of carus publishing company, peru, il. My goal here is to focus on spinozas ontological argument. His criticism is primarily directed at descartes, but also attacks leibniz.
Malcolms version malcolm pointed out the second version of the ontological argument, god is that, than which nothing greater can be conceived. The ontological argument made by anselm was criticized by one of his contemporaries, a monk named gaunilo, who said, that by anselm s reasoning, one could imagine a certain island, more perfect than any other island, tf this island can exist in the mind, then according to anselm, it would necessarily exist in reality, for a perfect island. We examine the famous ontological argument in proslogium ii. Neal, anselm s ontological argument for the existence of god from grace incarnate 1990 maciej nowicki, anselm and russell logic and logical philosophy 2006 15.
1631 1091 480 31 318 1148 1062 1366 1629 802 558 1390 1047 691 1100 663 356 1028 1260 1080 668 1017 1327 449 1324 1211 741 1233 872 785 143 888 692 1266